Papers
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022 2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016 2015
HOME PAPERS(523) REPORTS(264)
WHITEPAPERS(20)
KNIHY(24)
RFC popisy(9411)
SLOVNÍČEK(9) Podpůrné materiály(16)
| Date | Name | INFO |
CATEGORY |
SUBCATE |
|
31.7.26 |
Understanding
Implicit Trust Errors in Core Carrier Networks through Multi-Agent Flaw Discovery and Analysis |
Cellular core networks (CNs) are critical infrastructure, yet their internal security model has historically relied on physical isolation: interfaces between core components often operate within an assumed trust zone. As CNs transition to cloud-native deployments, this assumption weakens, expanding the attack surface and enabling external adversaries to reach previously internal interfaces. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
29.7.26 |
CryptanalysisBench: Can LLMs do Cryptanalysis? | Cryptanalysis—the task of finding attacks against cryptographic schemes—sits at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and cybersecurity, two areas where LLMs have advanced fastest. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
29.7.26 |
Cryptanalysis of 7-Round AES via the Algebraic Structure of its S-box | The AES S-Box is not a random permutation; we show that its algebraic structure allows for improved attacks on 7 rounds in the single-key setting. We focusour efforts on extending a 2 105 chosen plaintext and 2 99-time algorithm designed by | PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
29.7.26 |
HAWK-n Key Recovery Reduces to SVP in Dimension n/2 + 1 |
HAWK is a lattice signature scheme that is currently a
thirdround candidate in NIST’s post-quantum signature competition. We give an unconditional, deterministic polynomial-time reduction from HAWKn key recovery over Kn = Q(ζ2ℓ ) to poly(n) calls to an exact Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) oracle in dimension n/2 + 1, where n = 2ℓ−1 is the ring degree. |
PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
29.7.26 |
HAWK: Having Automorphisms Weakens Key | The search rank-2 module Lattice Isomorphism Problem (smLIP), over a cyclotomic ring of degree a power of two, can be reduced to an instance of the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (LIP) of at most half the rank if an adversary knows a nontrivial automorphism of the underlying integer lattice. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
29.7.26 |
HAWK | HAWK is a signature scheme inspired by the introduction of the lattice isomorphism problem (LIP) to signatures [DvW22], and this specification document is based on the article that first described a practical variant [DPPvW22a]. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
28.7.26 |
CyberGym-E2E:
Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents’ End-to-End Cybersecurity Capabilities |
AI has the potential to transform cybersecurity by enabling systems that can autonomously detect, analyze, and remediate software vulnerabilities. However, existing cybersecurity evaluations of AI systems are limited in scale or scope, and fail to capture the end-to-end lifecycle of real-world software vulnerability discovery and remediation | PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
28.7.26 |
CYBERGYM: EVALUATING AI AGENTS’ REAL-WORLD CYBERSECURITY CAPABILITIES AT SCALE |
AI agents have significant potential to reshape cybersecurity,
making a thorough assessment of their capabilities critical. However,
existing evaluations fall short, because they are based on small-scale benchmarks and only measure static outcomes, failing to capture the full, dynamic range of real-world security challenges. To address these limitations, we introduce CyberGym, a large-scale benchmark |
PAPERS | PAPERS |
|
22.7.26 |
ExploitGym: Can AI
Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks? |
AI agents are rapidly gaining capabilities that could significantly reshape cybersecurity, making rigorous evaluation urgent. A critical capability is exploitation: turning a vulnerability, which is not yet an attack, into a concrete security impact, such as unauthorized file access or code execution. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 10.7.26 |
Beware of
Agentic Botnets: Scalable Untargeted Promptware Attacks via Universal and Transferable Adversarial HalluSquatting |
The growing adoption of agentic LLM applicationshas introduced a new threat previously named as promptware. While prior work has established that adversaries can exploit direct channels to LLM applications to apply promptware (push adversarial prompts) under weak threat models (e.g., by sending emails or calendar invitations to a target), many applications do not provide any direct channels that could be exploited for prompt injection beyond the Internet. This raises a fundamental question: | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 |
The Promptware
Kill Chain: How Prompt Injections Gradually Evolved Into a Multistep Malware Delivery Mechanism |
Prompt injection was initially framed as the largelanguage model (LLM) analogue of SQL injection. However, over the past three years, attacks labeled as prompt injection have evolved from isolated input-manipulation exploits into multistep attack mechanisms that resemble malware. In this paper, we argue that prompt injections evolved into promptware, a new class of malware execution mechanism triggered through prompts engineered to exploit an application’s LLM. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 | Git Hash Chain Malleability | Git commit signing is widely entrusted to serve as evidence that a commit hash uniquely and immutably identifies a specific piece of signed content. We show this invariant does not hold. Given any signed commit, an attacker without access to the signing key, and without breaking SHA2 can produce a second, distinct commit with an identical tree, identical metadata, a valid signature, and a “Verified” badge from a Git Forge such as Github, differing only in its commit hash. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 |
Great, Now Write
an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack |
Large Language Models (LLMs) have risen significantly in popularity and are increasingly being adopted across multiple applications. These LLMs are heavily aligned to resist engaging in illegal or unethical topics as a means to avoid contributing to responsible AI harms. However, arecent line of attacks, known as “jailbreaks”, seek to overcome this alignment. Intuitively, jailbreak attacks aim to narrow the gap between what the model can do and what it is willing to do. In this paper, we introduce a novel jailbreak attack called Crescendo | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 |
Smoke and Mirrors:
Jailbreaking LLM-based Code Generation via Implicit Malicious Prompts |
The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has
revolutionized natural language processing and significantly impactedcode
generation tasks, enhancing software development efficiency and productivity.
Notably, LLMs like GPT-4 have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in
text-to-code generation tasks. However, the growing reliance on LLMs for
code generation necessitates a critical examination of the safety
implications associated with their outputs. Existing research efforts have
primarily focused on verifying the functional correctness of LLMs,
overlooking their safety in code generation. |
PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 |
RedCode: Risky
Code Execution and Generation Benchmark for Code Agents |
With the rapidly increasing capabilities and adoption of code agents for AI-assistedcoding and software development, safety and security concerns, such as generating or executing malicious code, have become significant barriers to the real-world deployment of these agents. To provide comprehensive and practical evaluations on the safety of code agents, we propose RedCode, an evaluation platform with benchmarks grounded in four key principles: real interaction with systems, holistic evaluation of unsafe code generation and execution, diverse input formats, and highquality safety scenarios and tests. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 |
Refusal-Trained
LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agents |
For safety reasons, large language models (LLMs) are trained to refuse harmful user instructions, such as assisting dangerous activities. We study an openquestion in this work: does the desired safety refusal, typically enforced in chat contexts, generalize to non-chat and agentic use cases? Unlike chatbots, LLM agents equipped with general-purpose tools, such as web browsers and mobile devices, can directly influence the real world, making it even more crucial to refuse harmful instructions. In this work, we primarily focus on red-teaming browser agents – LLMs that manipulate information via web browsers | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.7.26 |
Refused in Chat,
Written in Code: Workflow-Level Jailbreak Construction in IDE Coding Agents. |
Large language models are increasingly deployed as IDE-integrated coding agents that decompose tasks, generate and edit files, run code, and refine outputs over many turns. Yet their safety is still often evaluated as if they were chatbots: one harmful prompt, one response, judged in isolation. We introduce workflowlevel jailbreak construction, a failure mode in which a harmful objective is assembled across ordinary stages of a softwaredevelopment workflow rather than generated through a single direct prompt. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 6.7.26 | Reflecthernet: Exfiltrating 100BASE-TX Ethernet Traffic Using a Retroreflector Hardware Trojan | This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. Electromagnetic eavesdropping is a well-established attack vector for remotely monitoring a target activity, most notably displays, over considerable ranges. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 6.7.26 | TEMPEST-LoRa: Cross-Technology Covert Communication | Electromagnetic (EM) covert channels pose significant threats to computer and communications security in air-gapped networks. Previous works exploit EM radiation from various components (e.g., video cables, memory buses, CPUs) to secretly send sensitive information. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 6.7.26 | TrojPix: Electromagnetic Covert Channels via Imperceptible Pixel Modulation | Air-gapped networks rely on physical isolation to prevent external connectivity. Prior electromagnetic (EM) covert channels have exploited emissions from video cables, memory buses, and CPUs, yet they rarely achieve high throughput, long range, and visual imperceptibility simultaneously, limiting practical utility in air-gapped settings. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 30.6.26 |
Mind your key: An
Empirical Study of LLM API Credential Leakage in iOS Apps |
The rapid integration of large language models (LLMs) into mobileapplications has introduced a new class of credential security risk: leaked credentials that grant unauthorized access to LLM inference services, which can cause financial damage to the developer side. Prior work has studied credential leakage across various platforms, with a primary focus on Android Apps. However, to date, no empirical study has systematically investigated how LLM API key leakageoccurs in iOS applications. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 30.6.26 |
LM-Scout:
Analyzing the Security of Language Model Integration in Android Apps |
Developers are increasingly integrating Language Models (LMs) into their mobile apps to provide features such as chat-based assistants. To prevent LM misuse, they impose various restrictions, including limits on the number of queries, input length, and allowed topics. However, if the LM integration is insecure, attackers can bypass these restrictions and gain unrestricted access to the LM, potentially harming developers’ reputations and leading to significant financial losses. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 30.6.26 | Leaky Apps: Large-scale Analysis of Secrets Distributed inAndroid and iOS Apps | Mobile apps store various types of secrets to support their func-tionalities. These include API keys, and cryptographic material toauthenticate users and access backend services. Once distributed,attackers can reverse-engineer the apps, and these secrets becomeaccessible, posing risks such as data leaks, and service abuse | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 30.6.26 | On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores | LLM app stores have seen rapid growth, leading tothe proliferation of numerous custom LLM apps. However, this expansion raises security concerns. In this study, we propose a three-layer concern framework to identify the potential security risks of LLM apps, i.e., LLM apps with abusive potential, LLM apps with malicious intent, and LLM apps with exploitable vulnerabilities. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 30.6.26 | Protocol Prying: Systematic Vulnerability Research in the Apple AirDrop and Android Quick Share Proximity Transfer Protocols | Apple AirDrop and Google/Samsung Quick Share are proximity file-transfer protocols used by over five billion devices, yet their application-layer security properties remain largelyunstudied because both stacks are proprietary and undocumented | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 22.6.26 | Squidbleed (CVE-2026-47729) | Meet Squidbleed: a Heartbleed-style vulnerability that leaks internal memory from every version of Squid Proxy, in its default configuration. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 20.6.26 | Introducing usbliter8 | An A12/A13 SecureROM exploit | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 9.6.26 | FROST ATTACK | FROST: Fingerprinting Remotely using OPFS-based SSD Timing | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 6.6.26 |
Patch-to-PoC: A
Systematic Study of Agentic LLM Systems for Linux Kernel N-Day Reproduction |
Autonomous large language model (LLM) based systems have recently shown promising results across a range of cybersecurity tasks. However, there is no systematic study on their effectiveness in autonomously reproducing Linux kernel vulnerabilities with concrete proofs-of-concept (PoCs). | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 20.5.26 | StopRansomware Guide | Ransomware is a form of malware designed to encrypt files on a device, rendering them and the systems that rely on them unusable. Malicious actors then demand ransom in exchange for decryption. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 20.5.26 | SOFTWARE BILL OF MATERIALS FOR AI | Accessing information on the supply chain of an artificial intelligence (AI) system, as well as its individual components and dependencies, is critical to strengthen cybersecurity of AI. Transparency and knowledge about AI system composition fosters vulnerability management and supports cybersecurity risk management. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Linux Kernel Runtime Guard (LKRG) 1.0 | Linux Kernel Runtime Guard (LKRG) is a Linux kernel module that performs runtime integrity checking of the kernel and detection of security vulnerability exploits against the kernel, prevention of and response to successful attacks, and encrypted remote logging. The project was founded by Adam 'pi3' Zabrocki, who invited Solar Designer to join and we released version 0.0 publicly in 2018 under Openwall umbrella (announced as Openwall's most controversial project to date). | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Password cracking: past, present, future | Passwords (or phrases) remain a distinct and ubiquitous authentication factor. They are also widely used to derive encryption keys for data or other keys. Password cracking is used in security audits, penetration testing, to recover or gain access to data, keys, or funds, and for a variety of other purposes. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Linux kernel remote logging: approaches, challenges, implementation | This talk is based on research conducted for our Linux Kernel Runtime Guard (LKRG) project, which is a Linux kernel module that performs runtime integrity checking of the kernel and detection of security vulnerability exploits against the kernel. Delivery, storage, and processing of LKRG security events to/on a remote system is a natural extension of LKRG's functionality. Remote logging is also valuable on its own, including for troubleshooting and post-mortem analyses of (non-)security incidents, where the system's local logs might be unavailable, incomplete, or tampered with. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | 15+ years of oss-security | These are the slides of Solar Designer's SSTIC 2023 keynote talk with minor revisions as later presented at BSidesLjubljana 2023. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Linux Kernel Runtime Guard (LKRG) in a nutshell | These are the slides on LKRG that we used at OSTconf 2020. This presentation is an update of LKRG under the hood (CONFidence 2018). | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Linux Kernel Runtime Guard (LKRG) under the hood | These are the slides on LKRG that we used at CONFidence 2018. This presentation is updated by LKRG in a nutshell (OSTconf 2020), so you might want to check that one out as well. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Haswell metaprogramming | Haswell is an Intel CPU microarchitecture introduced to market in 2013 with CPUs such as Core i7-4770K (which we used for the testing mentioned on slide 3). The information on these slides should also apply to Intel's newer CPUs at least through the end of 2019. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | yescrypt: large-scale password hashing | These are the slides on yescrypt that we used at BSidesLjubljana 2017. In a sense, this presentation is a continuation of Password security: past, present, future (PHDays 2012, Passwords^12), Password hashing at scale (YaC 2012), New developments in password hashing: ROM-port-hard functions (ZeroNights 2012), and yescrypt: password hashing scalable beyond bcrypt and scrypt (PHDays 2014), so you might want to check those out as well. Also relevant is our presentation on Energy-efficient bcrypt cracking (Passwords^14). | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | john-devkit: specialized compiler for hash cracking | These are the slides we used for a lightning talk at PHDays 2015, and here's the corresponding GitHub project. Aleksey also gave a follow-up talk at PHDays 2016. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Is infosec a game? | You can play the game online in recent web browsers on fast CPUs (we use JsDOSBox) or offline in DOSBox (which works perfectly even on slower CPUs) or on bare metal (e.g. by adding it into a FreeDOS image). To obtain a copy for offline play, simply unzip the PDF file below (yes, you read this right). | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Energy-efficient bcrypt cracking | These are the slides we used at PasswordsCon Las Vegas 2014 (colocated with BSidesLV), Skytalks 2014 (colocated with DEFCON), and FSEC 2014. We used a much older version of these slides at PasswordsCon Bergen 2013. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | yescrypt: password hashing scalable beyond bcrypt and scrypt | These are the slides on yescrypt that we used at PHDays 2014. In a sense, this presentation is a continuation of Password security: past, present, future (PHDays 2012, Passwords^12), Password hashing at scale (YaC 2012), New developments in password hashing: ROM-port-hard functions (ZeroNights 2012), and it is continued with yescrypt: large-scale password hashing (BSidesLjubljana 2017), so please check those out as well. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Looking inside the (Drop) box | These are the slides we used at NordU2002, CanSecWest / core02, and FOSDEM 2003 (with updates). (A Polish translation was also used at Open Source Security 2005.) | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Distributable probabilistic candidate password generators | These are the slides we used at Passwords^12. You might also want to see Automatic wordlists mangling rules generation, also presented by Simon at Passwords^12. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Automatic wordlists mangling rules generation | These are the slides we used at Passwords^12. You might also want to see Distributable probabilistic candidate password generators, also presented by Simon at Passwords^12. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | New developments in password hashing: ROM-port-hard functions | These are the slides we used at ZeroNights 2012. In a sense, this presentation is a continuation of Password security: past, present, future (PHDays 2012, Passwords^12) and Password hashing at scale (YaC 2012), and it is continued with yescrypt: password hashing scalable beyond bcrypt and scrypt (PHDays 2014), so please check those out as well. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Password hashing at scale | These are the slides we used at YaC 2012. In a sense, this presentation is a continuation of Password security: past, present, future (PHDays 2012, Passwords^12) and it is continued with New developments in password hashing: ROM-port-hard functions (ZeroNights 2012) and yescrypt: password hashing scalable beyond bcrypt and scrypt (PHDays 2014), so please check those out as well. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | Password security: past, present, future | These are the slides we used at PHDays 2012 and Passwords^12 (with major updates). In a sense, this presentation is continued with Password hashing at scale (YaC 2012) and New developments in password hashing: ROM-port-hard functions (ZeroNights 2012), so please check those out as well, although the most relevant material from them has been merged into the Passwords^12 revision of this presentation. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | IPv6: What, Why, How | PAPERS | PAPERS | |
| 3.5.26 | Openwall GNU/*/Linux | This presentation/tutorial by Jen "Furry" Linkova introduces those familiar with IPv4 to IPv6. It covers both "executive" and highly technical topics, with slight bias on security and privacy. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 3.5.26 | SSH Traffic Analysis | These are the slides we used at HAL2001 and NordU2002 (with updates). | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 28.4.26 | LEROBOT: AN OPEN-SOURCE LIBRARY FOR END-TO-END ROBOT LEARNING | Robotics is undergoing a significant transformation powered by advances in highlevel control techniques based on machine learning, giving rise to the field of robot learning. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 26.4.26 | GopherWhisper | GopherWhisper: A burrow full of malware | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 10.4.26 | ESPIONAGE FOR REPRESSION: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF A CROSS-BORDER HACK-FOR-HIRE CAMPAIGN TARGETING CIVIL SOCIETY IN MENA | ESPIONAGE FOR REPRESSION: FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF A CROSS-BORDER HACK-FOR-HIRE CAMPAIGN TARGETING CIVIL SOCIETY IN MENA | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.4.26 | GeForge: Hammering GDDR Memory to Forge GPU Page Tables for Fun and Profit | Over the years, Rowhammer has been leveraged to mount a wide range of attacks against system main memory. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.4.26 |
GDDRHammer:
Greatly Disturbing DRAM Rows — Cross-Component Rowhammer Attacks from Modern GPUs |
While Rowhammer has been extensively studied in CPU-based memory systems, a very recent work by Lin etal. (USENIX Security ‘25) extended this line of research to GDDR6 GPU memory, demonstrating the first Rowhammer bit flips on NVIDIA GPUs | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 8.4.26 | GPUHammer: Rowhammer Attacks on GPU Memories are Practical | Rowhammer is a read disturbance vulnerability in modern DRAM that causes bit-flips, compromising security and reliability. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 17.2.26 |
Zero Knowledge
(About) Encryption: A Comparative Security Analysis of Three Cloud-based Password Managers |
Zero Knowledge Encryption is a term widely used by vendors of cloud-based password managers. Although it has no strict technical meaning, the term conveys the idea that the server, who stores encrypted password vaults on behalf of users, is unable to learn anything about the contents of those vaults. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 5.2.26 |
The Trigger in the
Haystack: Extracting and Reconstructing LLM Backdoor Triggers |
Detecting whether a model has been poisoned is a longstanding problem in AI security. In this work, we present a practical scanner for identifying sleeper agent-style backdoors in causal language models. | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 23.1.26 | Ransomware 2026 | New Actors and Threats Emerge as the Threat Landscape Evolves | PAPERS | PAPERS |
| 19.1.26 |
StackWarp: Breaking AMD SEV-SNP Integrity via Deterministic Stack-Pointer Manipulation through the CPU’s Stack Engine |
Confidential Virtual Machines (CVMs), such as AMD SEVSNP, aim
to protect guest operating systems from an untrusted host by encrypting state and constraining privileged control. These platforms promise isolation even in multi-tenant cloud setups where simultaneous multithreading (SMT) remains enabled |
PAPERS | PAPERS |